Alright, I want to stir the pot a bit: Let’s talk ethics around using services like U4GM’s weapon unlock for Battlefield 6. Some might call it smart time management; others will call it cheating or taking shortcuts that undermine the game’s design.

On one hand: players are busy. Not everyone has the free time to grind ranks, kills, headshots, or challenges. If you’re paying for convenience and still playing by the rules (assuming the service stays within terms of service), then what’s the harm? You’re unlocking the same gear that you could eventually get anyway; you’re just buying time. On the other hand: if the unlocks are part of the achievement structure, then bypassing them removes that sense of progression. Also, if many players use boosts, the player base might become divided between those who unlocked legitimately and those who didn’t – which could affect matchmaking or how people perceive each other’s accomplishments.

Furthermore: is it fair to players who don’t use services? Does it make the “skill gap” shift towards ability to pay rather than ability to improve? Could it push game designers to make even tougher unlocks knowing there’s a market for paying to skip? Regarding U4GM, they advertise “manual safe methods” and “zero bans” but again: not an official developer statement.  My view: If you do use these services, you should be transparent about it in your squad. And perhaps game studios should clarify whether this is allowed or not. Ultimately, it comes down to: Are you fine with paying for an unlock and accepting the ethical implications? Or do you prefer to earn it yourself? I’m leaning towards the latter—not because I’m against paying, but because the satisfaction of unlocking something you played for is hard to replicate.